Comparison

Headless Bridge vs Faust.js

Two different approaches to headless WordPress. Which one fits your project?

Quick Summary

Feature
Headless Bridge
Faust.js
What It Is
WordPress plugin (API layer)
Next.js framework
Approach
Pre-compiled REST API
WPGraphQL + Next.js
Framework Lock-in
None (works with anything)
Next.js only
Hosting
Any WordPress host
WP Engine recommended
Performance
Fastest (pre-compiled)
Fast (but GraphQL overhead)
Complexity
Lower
Higher
Price
Free + Pro ($49/yr)
Free (but WP Engine costs)

Bottom Line: Headless Bridge is a framework-agnostic API solution. Faust.js is a complete Next.js framework tied to WP Engine's ecosystem.

What They Are

Headless Bridge

A WordPress plugin that creates a lightning-fast API for your content. It pre-compiles JSON responses when you save content, making API requests extremely fast.

Key characteristics:

  • • Plugin for WordPress
  • • Works with any frontend (Next.js, Astro, Vue, anything)
  • • No hosting requirements
  • • REST-based API

Faust.js

A Next.js framework built by WP Engine specifically for headless WordPress. It provides pre-built components, hooks, and patterns for building Next.js sites.

Key characteristics:

  • • Complete Next.js framework
  • • Uses WPGraphQL under the hood
  • • Optimized for WP Engine hosting
  • • Provides React hooks and components

Key Differences

1. Scope and Approach

Headless Bridge

Focuses on one thing—making the WordPress API incredibly fast. It's the API layer only. You choose your own frontend framework, hosting, and architecture.

Faust.js

Provides a complete solution—framework, routing, components, and patterns. It's opinionated about how you build your frontend.

2. Framework Freedom

Headless Bridge

✅ Next.js✅ Astro✅ Vue/Nuxt✅ Svelte/SvelteKit✅ React (vanilla)✅ Any framework

Faust.js

✅ Next.js❌ Everything else

If you want to use Astro, Vue, or any non-Next.js framework, Faust.js isn't an option.

3. Performance Architecture

Headless Bridge

User Request → Fetch Pre-compiled JSON (1 query) → Return

Time: ~50ms

Faust.js

User Request → GraphQL Query → Resolve Fields → Multiple DB Queries → Return

Time: ~300-500ms

Faust.js inherits WPGraphQL's performance characteristics—runtime query resolution on every request.

4. Hosting Independence

Headless Bridge

  • WordPress: Any host (SiteGround, Cloudways, self-hosted, WP Engine, anything)
  • Frontend: Any host (Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, self-hosted, anything)

Faust.js

  • • Designed for WP Engine's Atlas platform
  • • Can work elsewhere but loses some features
  • • Tightly integrated with WP Engine ecosystem

Performance Comparison

API Response Times

Scenario
Headless Bridge
Faust.js (WPGraphQL)
Single post fetch
~50ms
~350ms
List (20 posts)
~65ms
~600ms
With ACF fields
~55ms
~450ms

Lighthouse Performance Score

Metric
Headless Bridge + Next.js
Faust.js
Performance
95-100
75-90
LCP
0.8-1.2s
1.5-2.5s
TTFB
50-80ms
200-400ms

The difference comes from API layer performance. Faust.js uses WPGraphQL, which adds significant overhead.

When to Choose Each

Choose Headless Bridge

  • Framework flexibility matters

    Want to use Astro, Vue, or Svelte; may switch frameworks in the future

  • Maximum performance

    SEO-critical projects, high-traffic sites, Core Web Vitals focus

  • Hosting independence

    Already have preferred WordPress host, don't want WP Engine lock-in

  • Simpler architecture

    Want standard REST patterns, don't need GraphQL complexity

Choose Faust.js

  • All-in on Next.js

    Team knows Next.js deeply, no plans to use other frameworks

  • WP Engine customer

    Already using WP Engine, want platform integration

  • Need GraphQL flexibility

    Complex, dynamic queries; different data shapes per page

  • Want opinionated structure

    Prefer framework conventions, less architectural decisions

Cost Comparison

Total Cost of Ownership (Annual)

Component
Headless Bridge
Faust.js
WordPress Plugin
$0-$49
$0 (WPGraphQL)
WordPress Hosting
$120-$600
$240-$2,400 (WP Engine)
Frontend Hosting
$0-$240 (Vercel)
$0-$240 (Vercel)
Total
$120-$889/yr
$240-$2,640/yr

Note: Faust.js works best with WP Engine Atlas, which starts at $20/month but scales to $200+/month for production sites.

Common Questions

"Is Faust.js free?"

The framework is free. But it's designed for WP Engine's ecosystem, and you'll likely need WP Engine hosting ($240+/year minimum) to get full benefits.

"Can I use Faust.js with other hosts?"

Technically yes. But you'll miss features like instant preview and optimized deployments that require WP Engine Atlas.

"Which is easier to learn?"

Headless Bridge if you know REST APIs and any JavaScript framework.
Faust.js if you already know Next.js deeply and want guided patterns.

"What about previews?"

Headless Bridge: Works with standard Next.js preview mode or any framework's preview system.
Faust.js: Has built-in preview integration with WordPress, especially on WP Engine.

Verdict

Choose Headless Bridge if:

  • • You want framework flexibility
  • • Performance is your top priority
  • • You want hosting independence
  • • You prefer simpler REST patterns

Choose Faust.js if:

  • • You're committed to Next.js only
  • • You're already a WP Engine customer
  • • You want a complete, opinionated framework
  • • You need GraphQL's query flexibility

The honest take: Headless Bridge is a focused tool that does one thing exceptionally well (fast API). Faust.js is a comprehensive framework that does many things well but comes with GraphQL's performance overhead and WP Engine's ecosystem preferences.

Try Headless Bridge

See the performance difference yourself.